Robin Hood

Yep, that’s right I’m going to talk about a movie.  Not only a movie, but a movie I saw twice IN ONE DAY!  Okay, that totally wasn’t on purpose, but when you suddenly have a babysitter you just go with it.  Having little to no recollection of the Disney version I can say I was surprised to see clips of it now and see how all encompassing they made their view.  Robin Hood was not merely a champion of the poor, but a champion of those beggared by taxation.  While I know that is the basic concept of the tale, it’s a facet that seems to have been missed in many other tellings.

Of course there was also the Kevin Costner version of the film which, strangely, I recall to be much better than what I see in clips now.  Honestly, where is the British accent?  And while we’re talking about that where the heck is the good acting?  Well, aside from Morgan Freeman that is.  But, truth be told, those two tales left politics out of much of the conversation when it came to taxation.  King Richard was a savior in both of the above versions, not culpable in the astronomical burden levied against a citizenry (okay, I have to make mention of Sean Connery as a good actor in that odious film as well – but he really wasn’t in it all that long).  The truth is each telling has spoken of taxation at the behest of a villainous, power mongering individual that is only ever relieved at the behest of a benevolent monarch.  Both stories would lead us to believe that power is good and something all people should be subject to despite its failings as shown in the actions of that villain.

Fast forward to 2010 and ‘lo and behold we are now greeted with this:

You must know, up front, that I adore Ridley Scott (even if I didn’t care for “Gladiator”) as he always does something interesting with his works.  This is no exception to that at all.  For all intents and purposes this film is about how the legend came to be, all the events that led up to Robin being declared an outlaw, and all the necessary politics that went into maintaining the monarchy.  The issues of freedom were given some vent if not at least good fodder for philosophical conversation if you feel so inclined, but overwhelmingly it spoke of the issues of taxation in a society where war was something demanded of the people by the monarch.  Make no mistake – this movie has some relatively gritty battle sequences – but this is war as a statement in reverence of and detestation of war.  Reverence for war when it came to a people’s need to defend themselves, their country, and in detestation against the foreign battles of the Crusades that brought many of them to their knees with poverty.

The acting, the cinematography were splendid with nary only one person who seemed to have issues with creating and maintaining an appropriate accent (luckily that person was not a lead) with only a few little issues to my mind.  First:  I’m so sick of that choppy way of filming these days that makes things seem to move faster.  Seriously?  Stop that.  It’s over done and it makes me dizzy.  Even still – it did not aggravate me all that much even when I saw it that second time.  Second:  That slow motion, kind of muted effect used when the hero/heroine screams?  Yeah, stop that too.  It’s just awkward and in the thick of battle that is the literary equivalent of sticking in a detailed account of what the characters are wearing while they’re trying to kill each other.  Battle cry?  Yes, please.  Slow motion battle cry, not once but twice?  Um, no.  Really.  No.

This film reminded me more of Braveheart in ideology than it did any previously told film version of Robin Hood.  To take this new spin on an old tale, to make it accessible to a PG-13 crowd was both a wonderful and formidable endeavor.  Even if one decided to not ponder the thoughts behind the story shown it still stood it’s own as a film.  Cate Blanchette was a far more believable heroine to me than even Miranda Otto’s Eowyn was in Lord of the Rings and this still says nothing of the lovely humorous elements the actress brought to the film.  Friar Tuck also aided in some much needed levity with his love of bees and Meade without ever once making the humor seem too adolescent or stilted.  There is, of course, Russell Crowe to contend with and, quite frankly, I adored him in this.  To this day I think his weakest performance since making a name for himself was in “Gladiator”.  While this was hardly an amazing stretch for him, unlike “Cinderella Man” or “A Beautiful Mind”, he still did an excellent job embodying an honest man forced into the life of a criminal.

I can not recommend this film enough.  Honestly, even after seeing it twice on Sunday I already want to see it again.  I leave this review with a quote from the estimable Martin Luther King, Jr which so wonderfully sums up this incarnation of Robin Hood:

An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law.

Have you seen this movie?  What did you think?


20 responses to “Robin Hood

  • Helen Ginger

    I did go see this movie and loved it. I couldn’t have dissected it the way you did to explain why I liked it, though. I just did.

    Straight From Hel

    • kimberlyloomis

      Helen – I think that just liking it and knowing you liked it is ultimately the most important part. I’m a wee bit obsessive. 😉

  • DL Hammons

    I haven’t seen it, but after this review I’m going to put it on my list of movies to see! I love Ridley Scott films also.

  • Joanne

    I haven’t seen this movie. Actually I haven’t been to the movies in far too long, and now you’re inspiring me to put that on my agenda! Time for a movie-night out …

    • kimberlyloomis

      Joanne – Hope you go and enjoy as much as I did. I rarely get to see a film on the big screen these days, but this was completely worth it.

  • Stephen Tremp

    I have not seen this movie, although i have seen Disney’s version and Men in Tights. I’ll wait until its available on Netflix to irder it.

    Stephen Tremp

    • kimberlyloomis

      Stephen- I feel totally ashamed that I had forgotten about Men in Tights! I loved that version! Given the cost of seeing a movie these days I whole heartedly understand going the Netflix route. 🙂 Definitely worth adding to the queue in my opinion. 🙂

  • Jes Mauldin

    I saw this movie- with Kim last Sunday and it was phenominal. I do enjoy the animated version and thought Crowe redeemed himself from his role in Gladiator. Horrid horrid movie -let’s tuck that one in the deep recesses of an attic. The underlying humor was great.

    Kim- you failed to comment on the out of focus the first time you saw it. It made both our eyes buggy. I recommend seeing this movie, even when it reminds me of Braveheart. The characters have such substance. It was a well done film.

    • kimberlyloomis

      Jes- Lol! I thought something seemed wonky about it! The second time I saw it each edge was nice and crisp, though. So true about “Gladiator”. Every time I’ve said that before people get very offended with me. For me I just kept thinking “Braveheart did it better”. Had a great time with you, too. 🙂

  • Teresa

    Now that’s a positive review. I haven’t seen it yet and wasn’t going to, but I must now with you seeing it twice and loving it.


    • kimberlyloomis

      Teresa- It was truly wonderful. I thought I’d be annoyed watching it again so soon and instead found myself truly enjoying it. There’s this moment where Cate is the grief stricken Marion and BOTH times it brought tears to my eyes.

  • Jemi Fraser

    My hubby & I actually talked about maybe seeing a movie some day soon – maybe this will be the one! Thanks 🙂

  • Elliot Grace

    …oldest son saw it last weekend and gave it two enthusiastic thumbs up:)

  • jessicabookworm

    I haven’t seen this but would love to, I am also a huge fan of Ridley Scott and Cate Blanchett, so win win for me.

  • lyndalepress

    Thanks for the review. I really wanted to see this movie in the theaters but had heard it was pretty bad; maybe I’ll reconsider.

    • kimberlyloomis

      Anne- I can see how some people wouldn’t like it. If you’re very much invested in the more popular version of the myth “champion of the poor, penalizing the rich” then this is most definitely not that story. At the same time, it is that story – but with the reasons behind why the poor were poor, etc. Let me know if you see it and what you think!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: